We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

Combined Sewer System Long Term Control Plan Update

Page One

1. Were the goals of this project clearly explained?

2. Did this meeting meet your expectations?

3. Please provide us with your thoughts about the importance of the proposed evaluation criteria and any other measures you would suggest. Your feedback will help us evaluate the proposed criteria.

Space Cell	High Importance	Moderate Importance	Low Importance	Not Important
Capital Cost	Capital Cost: High Importance	Capital Cost: Moderate Importance	Capital Cost: Low Importance	Capital Cost: Not Important
Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction (Volume)	Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction (Volume): High Importance	Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction (Volume): Moderate Importance	Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction (Volume): Low Importance	Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction (Volume): Not Important
Effectiveness	Effectiveness: High Importance	Effectiveness: Moderate Importance	Effectiveness: Low Importance	Effectiveness: Not Important
Expandability	Expandability: High Importance	Expandability: Moderate Importance	Expandability: Low Importance	Expandability: Not Important
Implementation Effort	Implementation Effort: High Importance	Implementation Effort: Moderate Importance	Implementation Effort: Low Importance	Implementation Effort: Not Important
Net Environmental Benefit	Net Environmental Benefit: High Importance	Net Environmental Benefit: Moderate Importance	Net Environmental Benefit: Low Importance	Net Environmental Benefit: Not Important
Credit trading between the combined sewer system and stormwater	Credit trading between the combined sewer system and stormwater: High Importance	Credit trading between the combined sewer system and stormwater: Moderate Importance	Credit trading between the combined sewer system and stormwater: Low Importance	Credit trading between the combined sewer system and stormwater: Not Important
Permitting Issues	Permitting Issues: High Importance	Permitting Issues: Moderate Importance	Permitting Issues: Low Importance	Permitting Issues: Not Important
Required Operation and Maintenance (including cost)	Required Operation and Maintenance (including cost): High Importance	Required Operation and Maintenance (including cost): Moderate Importance	Required Operation and Maintenance (including cost): Low Importance	Required Operation and Maintenance (including cost): Not Important
Enter another option	Other: High Importance	Other: Moderate Importance	Other: Low Importance	Other: Not Important

4. Based on your understanding of the preliminary advantages and disadvantages of each of the potential combined sewer overflow control strategies presented, please provide us with your thoughts on each strategy in terms of it being favorable, unfavorable or neutral.

Space Cell	Favorite	Neutral	Unfavorable
Storage Tunnels	Storage Tunnels: Favorite	Storage Tunnels: Neutral	Storage Tunnels: Unfavorable
Storage Tanks	Storage Tanks: Favorite	Storage Tanks: Neutral	Storage Tanks: Unfavorable
Sewer Separation	Sewer Separation: Favorite	Sewer Separation: Neutral	Sewer Separation: Unfavorable
Green Infrastructure	Green Infrastructure: Favorite	Green Infrastructure: Neutral	Green Infrastructure: Unfavorable
Disinfection	Disinfection: Favorite	Disinfection: Neutral	Disinfection: Unfavorable
Outfall Relocation	Outfall Relocation: Favorite	Outfall Relocation: Neutral	Outfall Relocation: Unfavorable

5. Are there other combined sewer overflow control strategies the City should consider evaluating or do you have specific concerns about the strategies listed above?

6. For future community meetings, what information would you like the City to present? Are there changes to the meeting format the City should consider?

7. Any thoughts?